🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising number of nations are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". A law may be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban is "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to pass a proposal lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a related move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised parents to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory motion demanding a ban for minors unless guardian approval is granted. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the resolution does not create binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a good foundation," stated the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "based on robust evidence".

Previously, support grew behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the relatives of a young person who was lost after viewing dangerous online content argues that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for children," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, action is largely happening at the local government level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning under-14s from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws requiring guardian approval for teenagers to create social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some individuals to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Views

Apart from Europe and the US, additional states are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, world bodies adopt a more cautious position. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The organization points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

Even as this international conversation unfolds, the actions of Australia and several other countries show that policymakers internationally are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.